How 'Meaningless Mumph' Does a Bidder Harm

By Admin
Bidders cause themselves a huge problem when they insist on using trendy fashion-speak and other frivolous fuzz in their written responses.There are two...

Bidders cause themselves a huge problem when they insist on using trendy fashion-speak and other frivolous fuzz in their written responses.

There are two key reasons they do this; neither of them good.

More often than not, the use of this gobbledygook is an attempt to sound sophisticated and “switched on” . . . “up to the minute”.

Other times it’s to smoke over a lack of substance in answers to the bid documentation’s questions.

Often it’s both.

Bid teams and their writers can also get tangled up in this type of non-English even when there actually is knowledge and potential substance to be conveyed.

Here are some (fabricated) examples of this “empty” writing.

Example 1

We employ best-of-breed technology options to implement cutting-edge, proven solutions, ensuring you of a constantly innovative approach and continuous improvement in your IT environment.

Example 2

Our track record demonstrates our commitment to world best practice and, accordingly, we will engage our focus on innovation throughout the contract.

Example 3

As your business partner, we will work closely with you to leverage our experience across the project, producing an optimal solution that is robust, scalable and that can be seamlessly integrated with your existing systems.

This convoluted, non-information is what results when little or no prior planning takes place and where, as a result, there is no central bid strategy. Worse still, this strategy-less starting point guarantees a very supplier-centric bid or proposal. And usually one that is not even particularly readable or sensible, let alone compelling.

My recommendations are two-fold:

  1. Use plain English. Resist the temptation to dazzle the prospective customer or client organisation and its evaluators with an extensive array of corporate or industry jargon.
  2. Place priority emphasis (as early as possible) on conducting intensive, thorough bid strategy planning sessions (preceded by comprehensive client, contract/project and competitor research). This will help ensure a distinctive win theme and, in turn, solid content.

Jordan Kelly is a bid strategist, writer and coach/trainer. She is the author of a growing selection of books (including her flagship, 'Think and Win Bids') that help construction industry executives position their organisations successfully for high-value bid wins. Claim your free subscription to her fortnightly electronic newsletter, 'The Bid Strategist', at www.bidstrategist.com

Share

Featured Articles

McKinsey: Tech can Help Construction Address Staffing Issue

McKinsey analysis of US skilled-labour shortage suggests ways technology can help tackle construction workforce challenges

Skanska Remains on Target for Sustainability Goals

Skanska, the global construction group, reports Q1 2024 results, with its performance on Scopes 1,2 & 3 GHG emissions remaining on track

Intel & Micron Join US Women-in-Construction Drive

Intel & Micron Technology early adoptors of US government's CHIPS Women in Construction Framework, designed to double number of women in construction

Dubai new Al Maktoum Airport Will be World's Largest

Built Environment

Caterpillar: Profile of a Construction Equipment Giant

Built Environment

ROSHN Helping Build new Future for Saudi Arabia

Construction Projects